Threats change. Standards are updated. Organisations restructure. The management systems that held up at certification are not always the ones that hold up twelve months later. Answer a few questions about your system and get an indicative SSF Effectiveness Score in minutes. No documents, no obligation.
The free Readiness Check is a self-assessed version of the SSF Effectiveness Model. It samples four of the highest-signal areas to give you an indicative SSF Effectiveness Score in minutes. The full model, applied on every paid engagement, scores every requirement of the standard at audit and reviews your objectives quarterly. Complete the Readiness Check below to see where you stand today.
The Readiness Check above is the self-assessed version. The Management System Health Check is the evidence-based one: we apply the full SSF Effectiveness Model to your real artefacts, your risk register, management review records, scope, and SOA or BIA, and return your SSF Effectiveness Score with a practitioner-rated RAG report in days. Same measure, assessed against your actual evidence rather than your own estimate. A mutual NDA and secure document transfer are in place before any documents are shared.
If you are not measuring effectiveness, what are you measuring?
Most certified organisations cannot put a number on how well their management system is actually working. SSF can. We score every requirement at internal audit on how effectively it is operating, average it across the whole standard, and review the objectives behind it every quarter. Our clients consistently sit in the Effective band. The free check below gives you an indicative score in minutes, without sharing a single document.
Threats evolve. Organisations change. Standards are updated. The artefacts below are the ones that most honestly show whether a management system has moved with those changes or quietly fallen behind. You cannot hide a stale risk register or an outdated BIA for long.
The report is concise by design. Each area is rated Red, Amber, or Green with a short observation and a recommended action where relevant. Select the standard below.
| Area | Illustrative Rating | What We Assess |
|---|---|---|
| Risk Register | Amber | Completeness, currency, asset linkage, ownership, and treatment plan status across the register. |
| Scope Definition | Green | Whether the scope accurately reflects the organisation's current operating environment and would withstand audit scrutiny. |
| Statement of Applicability | Red | Version control, alignment with the current control set (Annex A / ISO 27002), and documented justification for any exclusions. |
| Management Review | Amber | Frequency relative to the audit cycle, agenda coverage against clause 9.3 requirements, and quality of action tracking. |
| Continual Improvement Evidence | Amber | Whether improvement actions from reviews, audits, and incidents are being tracked through to closure and reported at management level. |
| Overall System Maturity | Amber | An informed view of overall ISMS health - the signal a surveillance auditor is likely to receive from these artefacts. |
| Area | Illustrative Rating | What We Assess |
|---|---|---|
| Risk Register | Amber | Completeness, currency, ownership, and treatment plan status - assessed against BCM-specific risk and threat categories. |
| Scope Definition | Green | Whether the BCMS scope accurately reflects the organisation's current operations, dependencies, and interested parties. |
| Business Impact Analysis | Red | Currency of the BIA, validity of Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs) and Recovery Point Objectives (RPOs), and whether outputs are clearly linked to continuity plans. |
| Management Review | Amber | Frequency, agenda coverage against clause 9.3 requirements, and whether review outputs are driving meaningful system improvement. |
| Continual Improvement Evidence | Amber | Whether improvement actions - including post-exercise findings - are tracked, closed, and reported at management level. |
| Overall System Maturity | Amber | An informed view of overall BCMS health - whether the system would demonstrate genuine resilience or surface gaps under audit conditions. |
There is no onboarding. No discovery calls before we begin. You share your artefacts, we start immediately.
Concise, direct, and written for the people who need to act on it.